Press Release|Funds
KBRA Affirms All Ratings for Alp CFO 2024, L.P.
6 Aug 2026 | New York
KBRA affirms its ratings on the Class A, Class B, and Class C Notes (collectively, the "Secured Notes") issued by Alp CFO 2024, L.P. (the "Issuer"). The Outlook on all ratings is Stable.
Since issuance, the performance of the transaction remains stable. The LTV on the Secured Notes is lower than the initial advance rate due to appreciation in value of the underlying LP Interests. As of April 2026, the performance and characteristics of the underlying collateral remains largely consistent with initial expectations.
Key Credit Considerations
- Asset Coverage: As of March 2026, the Class A Notes, Class B Notes, and Class C Notes have an LTV/Asset Coverage of 49.1%/203.5%, 63.9%/156.5%, and 73.7%/135.6%, respectively. At issuance, the Class A Notes, Class B Notes, and Class C Notes had an initial LTV/Asset Coverage of 50.0%/200.0%, 65.0%/153.8%, and 75.0%/133.3%.
- Key Structural Features: The key structural features of the transactions are as follows:
- Interest Reserve Account : The Reserve Account was funded on the Closing Date in an amount equal to at least 4.0% of the aggregate outstanding principal balance of the Secured Notes (the “Target Amount”). On each Payment Date in accordance with the Priority of Payments, proceeds will be deposited into the Reserve Account to the extent required so that the balance equals the Target Balance. Reserve Account deposits can be used to meet Fund Obligations, invest into Liquid Assets or to meet timely interest and fee payments on the Liquidity Facility and the Secured Notes. As of March 2026, the Reserve Account balance is $30 million.
- LTV Trigger: Holders of the Secured Notes benefit from a Loan-to-Value Ratio (LTV) test, which restricts distributions to the Subordinated Notes if the applicable LTV threshold is exceeded. The LTV is calculated as the aggregate outstanding principal balance of the Secured Notes, plus any Deferred Interest and outstanding Liquidity Facility amounts, divided by the Borrowing Base. The Borrowing Base comprises cash held in transaction accounts (other than a reserve account for tax distributions), the NAV of the Private Assets and the NAV of the Liquid Assets. Over time, the maximum permitted LTV declines over time, from 75.0% at closing to 50.0% in year 6 before reducing to 0% in year 8.
- Amortization Test: While the Secured Notes are outstanding, the amortization test is satisfied if scheduled principal amount due on each Payment Date, together with any Deferred Interest, is paid in accordance with the applicable amortization schedule. Any scheduled amounts not paid do not constitute an Event of Default and instead are carried forward to subsequent payment dates. The Class A Notes are targeted to be fully amortized by 2029. Amortization of the Class B Notes is subordinate to, and contingent upon, compliance with the Class A amortization schedule, with full amortization targeted by 2030. Similarly, amortization of the Class C Notes is subordinate to, and contingent upon, compliance with the Class A and Class B amortization schedules, with full amortization targeted by 2031. The first scheduled amortization payment is due in January 2027.
- Liquidity Facility LTV Test: The Liquidity Facility features a Maximum LTV Test, set at 20% from closing. The Test is calculated as the aggregate principal amount of the Liquidity Facility outstanding, plus any accrued and unpaid interest and fees divided by the Liquidity Facility Borrowing Base. The Liquidity Facility Borrowing base is defined as the sum of eligible pledged cash, the adjusted NAV of the Private Assets and NAV of the Liquid Assets, subject to adjustment under the terms of the Liquidity Loan Facility Agreement for concentration limitations and minimum eligible private assets. The Liquidity Facility LTV Test restricts further draws on the Facility to the extent it is not in compliance, it also requires prepayment of the Facility balance within the earlier of 15 days from notice of a breach, and the next payment date. Alternatively, the Borrower can submit a required LTV plan, which requires the approval of lenders. If the Borrower fails to adhere to the cure requirements after the failure of the Liquidity Facility LTV test, it will constitute an Event of Default.
- Evolving Portfolio of Private Asset Collateral: The Private Assets funds were identified at closing. The commitments to certain existing funds were substantially funded, providing greater visibility and certainty with respect to the underlying collateral. In contrast, commitments to newer fund vintages are subject to blind pool risk, as a portion of the capital was yet to be invested.
- Alignment of Interests: In certain strategies of the Private Assets, and particularly with respect to GP-Centered Investments, AlpInvest seeks sizeable personal investments from the GP. Moderate fees and tiered carried interest waterfalls as well as management incentive plans are aligned to AlpInvest’s entry price for both the GP and underlying management teams.
- Vulnerability to Uncertain Cash Flow: While the initial pool of Liquid Assets provides reliable cash flow for debt service in the early years of the transaction, the payment of ultimate interest and principal on the Secured Notes in the later stages of the transaction depends heavily on realizations from Private Assets, which, as alternative investments, do not generate cashflow on a fixed schedule nor in predetermined amounts. This risk is partially mitigated through ongoing allocations to Liquid Assets and access to a three-year Liquidity Facility, which provides a cushion to cover unanticipated liquidity shortfalls before the Private Assets begin to generate distributions. The borrowers of the Liquidity Facility can request one-year extensions on each anniversary of the Closing Date to maintain a three-year tenor. In December 2025, the maturity date of the Liquidity Facility was extended to October 2028.
- Quality of Private Assets: The Private Assets are considered to have greater price volatility, inherent illiquidity, and more idiosyncratic risk than the Liquid Assets. On a blended basis over the life of the transaction, KBRA views the expected overall asset quality of the collateral to reflect quality consistent with equity-like risk.
- Quality of Liquid Assets: The Liquid Assets, of which any excess cash from the initial drawn Notes as well as future distributions may be invested into before they are recycled into capital calls from the Private Assets, pose several risks:
- No Concentration or Diversity Limitations: No single obligor limits apply to Liquid Assets so there could be several investments concentrated in any particular asset or industry.
- Obligor Risk: Aside from performance related reasons, the value of investments may decline for reasons directly related to the respective obligor such as management performance, financial leverage or just a reduced demand for the obligor’s goods or services. KBRA does not have reasonable insight into who these obligors are to carry out any meaningful analysis on them.
- Credit Ratings Requirements: The Liquid Assets are subject to Liquid Asset Required Ratings such that any obligation or security has both a long-term and short-term credit rating from Moody’s of Aa3 or higher and P-1 or higher, respectively, or just a long-term credit rating at least equal to or higher than the current Moody’s long-term rating of the U.S Government debt. Downgraded assets would be liquidated and new assets that are in compliance would be acquired. Credit ratings do not evaluate the risks of fluctuations in market value and so KBRA considers this risk in its cash flow analysis.
- Issuer Overcommitment: The Issuer raised $1,000 million to purchase LP interests at approximately $350 million and service an estimated unfunded commitment of $1,057 million. The reason for this overcommitment is to ensure that most, if not all, the Notes’ proceeds will be deployed into the Private Assets. The Issuer expects that distributions in the early periods of the transaction will be recycled and used to fulfill capital calls in lieu of Notes’ proceeds. AlpInvest expects approximately 54% of the capital commitments will be called. This, combined with a $150 million Liquidity Facility, would cover all potential commitments. However, any capital called beyond this would have to be serviced by any excess cash from distributions in various accounts, the Liquid Assets or the Reserve Account. As of April 2026, $777 million has been called.
- Events of Default Linked to the Manager: The Notes include Events of Default linked to the Issuer General Partner, the Manager or any Permitted Subsidiary, including bankruptcy or insolvency, or if a court of competent jurisdiction appoints a liquidator of the Issuer General Partner or Manager. As such, an Event of Default on the Notes could be triggered following an adjudication of insolvency of the Manager, without any significant deterioration on the performance of the underlying assets. KBRA recognizes that The Carlyle Group Inc. is a publicly rated entity and has an AUM of $485.5 billion, while the Manager is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Carlyle Group Inc. with AUM of approximately $111.7 billion with its affiliated AlpInvest advisor entities, as of June 30, 2026. However, a deterioration of the credit worthiness of the Manager could impact the ratings assigned to the Notes as a result of these non-standard Events of Default.
- Manager Review and Track Record: AlpInvest is a global private equity asset manager with $111.7 billion in assets under management (AUM) and over 306 professionals across six offices globally. As of June 30, 2026, AlpInvest’s parent company, Carlyle, reported $485.5 billion in AUM. AlpInvest is a core part of the Carlyle platform, representing approximately 23% of Carlyle's total AUM. The strategies employed by AlpInvest include (i) primary investments & co-investments, launched in 2000, (ii) secondary investments, launched in 2002, and (iii) portfolio finance, launched in 2018. As of March 31, 2026, AlpInvest has completed 275+ secondary and portfolio finance investments, and 530+ co-investments, with over $52 billion and $26 billion in assets under management, respectively.
Rating Sensitivities
- Underperformance of Fund Collateral: Deterioration in portfolio valuation or a trend of collateral cash flows that are notably lower than current forecasted performance.
- Asset Coverage: De-leveraging of the Secured Notes coupled with stable performance that decreases LTV.
- Deterioration of Manager, Issuer General Partner, or Permitted Subsidiary Financials: In the event of deterioration in the financials of the Manager or the Issuer General Partner or Permitted Subsidiary, to include a bankruptcy or insolvency, KBRA would consider a downgrade ratings revision.
To access ratings and relevant documents, click here.
Click here to view the report.