Press Release|Insurance

KBRA Affirms Ratings for Aspida Holdings Ltd. and Certain Operating Subsidiaries, Revises Outlook to Positive from Stable

17 Jul 2026   |   New York

Contacts

KBRA affirms the A- insurer financial strength ratings (IFSRs) of Aspida Life Insurance Company and Aspida Life Re Ltd. as well as the BBB issuer rating of Aspida Holdings Ltd. Collectively the companies are referred to as Aspida. The Outlook for all ratings has been revised to Positive from Stable.

The Positive Outlook reflects Aspida's successful execution of its business strategy, including achieving meaningful operating scale since launch, group supervision by the Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA), diversifying distribution channels, expanding institutional funding sources, and demonstrating consistent access to capital.

Key Credit Considerations

The ratings reflect Aspida’s demonstrated ability to implement its growth strategy, strong capital access and financial flexibility, disciplined liquidity and asset-liability management, diversified retirement franchise, improving earnings profile, and maturing governance/enterprise risk management framework. Management has continued to build out its franchise by expanding Aspida’s market presence, launching new products, entering new distribution channels, and successfully integrating new reinsurance relationships while maintaining capital above internal operating targets, demonstrating an ability to scale rapidly without weakening the company’s overall financial profile. Aspida benefits from multiple sources of financial flexibility, including, committed equity capital, diversified bank financing, institutional funding programs, and demonstrated access to additional private capital. These resources provide meaningful capacity to support continued growth while maintaining regulatory capital and financial flexibility. Liquidity management and asset-liability management (ALM) remain core strengths of the platform. Formal liquidity governance, entity- and treaty-level cash flow monitoring, duration management, stress testing, and continued enhancement of ALM capabilities support the group's rapidly expanding balance sheet and spread-based business model. In a relatively short period, Aspida has established a meaningful asset-intensive retirement platform across three complementary origination channels: retail annuities, reinsurance, and institutional funding. Continued expansion of distribution channels, reinsurance relationships, and product offerings has broadened the business profile while reducing reliance on any single source of liability origination. Underlying earnings capacity continues to improve as the franchise matures and invested assets increase. Aspida continues to strengthen its governance and enterprise risk management framework through enhancements to liquidity management, recovery planning, capital management, ALM, and group-wide risk oversight. While these developments are viewed favorably by KBRA, implementation of the Bermuda group supervision framework remains ongoing and is expected to require additional operational maturity.

Balancing these strengths are increasing organizational and investment complexity, continued dependence on external capital to support planned growth, and execution risk during its regulatory transition from individual entity to group supervision by the BMA. Rapid balance sheet growth has increased organizational complexity across multiple jurisdictions while increasing exposure to structured credit, residential mortgage loans, alternative investments, and affiliated reinsurance arrangements, all of which will require continued disciplined execution to keep pace with expansion of the platform. Although internally generated earnings continue to improve, Aspida's growth strategy remains dependent on continued access to external sources of capital to support and maintain target regulatory capital ratios. Greater reliance on internally generated capital over time would strengthen Aspida’s financial profile. Aspida has made substantial progress implementing governance, capital management, and risk management enhancements associated with Bermuda group supervision. However, the group supervision framework continues to evolve, and additional evidence of sustained operation under the new supervisory regime is needed before the full benefits of the enhanced framework can be fully reflected in Aspida’s ratings.

Rating Sensitivities

Positive rating action could occur if the Bermuda group supervision framework, including continued enhancement of governance, enterprise risk management and capital management consistent with the group’s increasing scale and complexity, is successfully implemented over the medium term; continued improvement in earnings generation sufficient to support a greater portion of planned growth through internally generated capital, reducing reliance on external capital to maintain risk-based capital ratios comfortably above internal targets; and/or demonstration of the ability to sustain profitability, prudent balance sheet management, and favorable operating performance through a broader range of market conditions while maintaining strong asset quality, liquidity, and ALM metrics.

Negative rating action could occur if there is material deterioration in capital adequacy, liquidity, or financial leverage, including reduced access to external capital or an inability to support planned growth; material weakening of operating performance or risk management, including sustained deterioration in profitability, adverse investment performance, significant credit losses, or weakened ALM execution: and/or failure to successfully execute continued growth while maintaining effective governance, enterprise risk management, and regulatory compliance under the evolving Bermuda group supervisory framework.

To access ratings and relevant documents, click here.

Recent Publication

Methodology

Disclosures

A description of all substantially material sources that were used to prepare the credit rating and information on the methodology(ies) (inclusive of any material models and sensitivity analyses of the relevant key rating assumptions, as applicable) used in determining the credit rating is available in the Information Disclosure Form(s) located here.

Information on the meaning of each rating category can be located here.

Further disclosures relating to this rating action are available in the Information Disclosure Form(s) referenced above. Additional information regarding KBRA policies, methodologies, rating scales and disclosures are available at www.kbra.com.

About KBRA

Kroll Bond Rating Agency, LLC (KBRA), one of the major credit rating agencies (CRA), is a full-service CRA registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as an NRSRO. Kroll Bond Rating Agency Europe Limited is registered as a CRA with the European Securities and Markets Authority. Kroll Bond Rating Agency UK Limited is registered as a CRA with the UK Financial Conduct Authority. In addition, KBRA is designated as a Designated Rating Organization (DRO) by the Ontario Securities Commission for issuers of asset-backed securities to file a short form prospectus or shelf prospectus. KBRA is also recognized as a Qualified Rating Agency by Taiwan’s Financial Supervisory Commission and is recognized by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners as a Credit Rating Provider (CRP) in the U.S.

Doc ID: 1016026