KBRA Affirms and Publishes the Rating Assigned to ING Bank N.V., Singapore Branch's Participation in a Subscription Finance Facility to CVC Capital Partners Asia VI
27 Apr 2026 | Dublin
KBRA Europe (KBRA) affirms the A+ rating assigned to ING Bank N.V., Singapore Branch's ("ING") $200.0 million commitment in a $2,500.0 million revolving credit facility (the “Facility”) to CVC Capital Partners Asia VI (A) LP (“Jersey Main Partnership”), CVC Capital Partners Asia VI (B) SCSp ("Luxembourg Main Partnership”), CVC Capital Partners Investment Asia VI LP, and CVC Capital Partners Asia VI (B) Associates SCSp (together, “CVC Asia VI” or the “Fund”). The Outlook is Stable. On 9 September 2024, KBRA assigned an A+ rating to the Facility on an unpublished basis. The rating has been converted from unpublished to published, as part of this surveillance. The rating was requested by ING as a participating lender in this transaction. Neither CVC Capital Partners Asia VI Limited nor CVC Capital Partners Asia VI GP S.à r.l. nor any of their respective associates have requested this report or the rating, and this report has not been prepared for or approved by any of them.
The Facility is due to mature in December 2026, subject to extension options of between three and 36 months, upon the Lenders' consent. The Facility is used for financing investments along with the costs and expenses of financing investments and payment of management fees, costs and expenses of the Fund, as well as any other purpose permitted under the Fund documents.
The rating action reflects the stable credit quality of the limited partner (LP) base and the continued deployment of the Fund in terms of total commitments. The majority of LPs across both the Jersey and Luxembourg Main Partnerships continue to be assessed as equivalent to investment grade credit quality, consistent with previous surveillance. Diversification of LP commitments also remains broadly in line with previous surveillance, with the Jersey Main Partnership exhibiting a more diversified LP base and the Luxembourg Main Partnership LP base remaining more concentrated. As of September 2025, the Fund has called approximately 12.8% of LP commitments. KBRA views the combination of these factors as continued incentive for LPs to continue to meet future capital calls for repayment.
CVC Asia VI is a 2024 vintage fund managed by CVC Capital Partners ("CVC") and represents the sixth vintage in CVC Asia's private equity strategy, focusing on control-oriented buyout investments across the Asia Pacific region.
CVC is an alternative investment manager established in 1981 with seven strategies in private equity, secondaries, credit and infrastructure. As of December 2025, CVC has approximately €205.0 billion of assets under management and operates from 29 global offices across Europe, the Americas and the Asia Pacific regions. As of December 2025, CVC's private equity platform manages €114.0 billion of assets across four strategies: Europe/Americas, Asia, Strategic Opportunities and Catalyst. CVC established CVC Asia in 1999 and as of December 2025, CVC Asia has approximately €11.0 billion of assets under management across six funds.
Key Credit Considerations
Investment fund ratings are based on quantitative and qualitative factors. The five key quantitative determinants are as follows:
- In the Asset Quality determinant, KBRA generally measures the quality of the collateral based on a weighted average scoring. For Subscription Facilities (“Sublines”), this includes an assessment using a matrix-based approach that reflects the creditworthiness of the Fund’s LP base.
- The Asset Coverage determinant measures the relative sufficiency of the pledged collateral value to repay the principal amount of the rated debt. For Sublines, this includes an evaluation of the covenants included in the Facility linked to uncalled committed capital (UCC) and NAV of the Fund, and/or advance rates applied to the UCC.
- The Liquidity determinant reflects KBRA’s assessment of the relative price discount that the underlying collateral may incur if the assets are subject to conversion into cash in order to meet scheduled or accelerated debt service requirements. Under the Liquidity determinant, KBRA considers three factors (type, complexity and price discovery / transparency) and scores these factors individually on a scale of zero to two, with two being the most liquid.
- In the Duration determinant, KBRA examines the tenor profile of the pledged collateral relative to the rated debt, and the associated vulnerability to changes in price of collateral over time.
- When appropriate, KBRA will perform a cash flow analysis in order to test the transaction’s ability to meet its rated interest and principal payment obligations under various economic, financial, and market scenarios. This is not applicable to Subscription Facilities, as LP capital calls typically occur on a non-periodic basis and the primary source of repayment for Sublines is the Fund’s UCC so once a capital call is issued, the LP is typically required to meet the capital call within a short window. Therefore, repayment capacity is analysed in the context of the prior rating determinants.
The above quantitative determinants produce a quantitative rating outcome. In addition to the above quantitative determinants, KBRA’s analysis considers a variety of qualitative factors, which can lead to upward or downward adjustments in the final rating outcome and these are assessed in the context of: (i) Manager Review; (ii) Legal Review, and (iii) Other Factors including alignment of interests, incentives to fund future capital calls and diversification within the LP base.
Rating Sensitivities
It should be noted that many aspects, including but not limited to, the rating sensitivities listed below, macroeconomic factors, market conditions, competitive landscape, and a fund manager’s investment acumen can impact the performance of the fund and influence KBRA’s rating decisions. If performance of the transaction differs meaningfully from the expected levels, KBRA may consider making a rating change.
Decline in LP Credit Quality
A decline in the credit quality of the Fund’s LPs as a result of: (i) deterioration in the credit quality of underlying LPs; (ii) transfer of interests to LPs of lower credit quality characteristics; (iii) inclusion of LPs with weak credit quality characteristics; and (iv) weaker than expected LP diversification, may result in negative rating changes.
Improvement in LP Credit Quality
An overall higher credit quality of the Fund’s LPs as a result of: (i) improvement in the credit quality of underlying LPs; (ii) transfer of interests to LPs with better credit characteristics; (iii) inclusion of LPs with strong credit quality characteristics; and (iv) stronger than expected LP diversification, may result in positive rating changes.
Underperformance of Fund Assets or Investments
A decrease in the Fund’s fair market value due to underperformance of the Fund’s underlying assets or investments may jeopardise debt repayment as the deterioration of the Fund may, for example, elicit hesitation of the Fund’s LPs to fund their respective capital calls regardless of their contractual obligations to do so and the underlying LPs’ security and protections to the Lender.
To access ratings and relevant documents, click here.
Click here to view the report.