KBRA Affirms the Rating of BNP Paribas' Participation in a Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility to Five Arrows Principal Investments IV
3 Feb 2026 | London
KBRA UK (KBRA) affirms the A rating assigned to BNP Paribas' ("BNPP") participation in a €525.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility (the "Facility"), provided by a consortium of lenders (the "Lenders") to the partnerships comprising Five Arrows Principal Investments IV (“FAPI IV” or the “Fund”). The rating was requested by BNPP as a participating lender in the transaction.
The Facility is a €525.0 million multi-currency subscription facility. The purpose of the Facility is for the financing and refinancing of any direct and indirect investments, payment of fees, costs and expenses, issuance of letters of credit, payment under the facility and other permitted purposes under the Fund’s constitutional documents. In October 2025, the Total Commitment under the Facility was reduced from €625.0 million to €525.0 million, while the termination date was extended to October 2027, with a further one-year extension option at the Lenders' discretion.
The rating action reflects the stable credit quality of the LP base and the stable performance of the Fund. The credit quality of the LPs remains in line with the previous surveillance. As of June 2025, the Fund has called approximately 59.0% of LP commitments, up from 37.6% at the previous surveillance. In addition, the Fund continues to perform in line with previous surveillance. KBRA views the combination of these factors as a continued incentive for LPs to continue to meet future capital calls for repayment. Since the previous surveillance, uncalled committed capital (UCC) Coverage Ratio Covenant requirement thresholds have reduced, however KBRA notes that a net asset value (NAV) Coverage Ratio has been introduced as a new Financial Covenant supporting the Facility.
FAPI IV is a 2022 vintage fund which held its final close in October 2023, having received approximately €2,518.8 million in commitments. FAPI IV is the fourth vintage of Five Arrows Managers S.A.S' European mid-market strategy, and as such, the Fund will pursue similar investments to its predecessor funds, targeting companies with enterprise value of €150 million - €500 million.
Key Credit Considerations
Investment fund ratings are based on quantitative and qualitative factors. The five key quantitative determinants are as follows:
- In the Asset Quality determinant, KBRA generally measures the quality of the collateral based on a weighted average scoring. For Subscription Facilities (“Sublines”), this includes an assessment using a matrix-based approach that reflects the creditworthiness of the Fund’s LP base.
- The Asset Coverage determinant measures the relative sufficiency of the pledged collateral value to repay the principal amount of the rated debt. For Sublines, this includes an evaluation of the covenants included in the Facility linked to UCC and NAV of the Fund, and/or advance rates applied to the UCC.
- The Liquidity determinant reflects KBRA’s assessment of the relative price discount that the underlying collateral may incur if the assets are subject to conversion into cash in order to meet scheduled or accelerated debt service requirements. Under the Liquidity determinant, KBRA considers three factors (type, complexity and price discovery / transparency) and scores these factors individually on a scale of zero to two, with two being the most liquid.
- In the Duration determinant, KBRA examines the tenor profile of the pledged collateral relative to the rated debt, and the associated vulnerability to changes in price of collateral over time.
- When appropriate, KBRA will perform a cash flow analysis in order to test the transaction’s ability to meet its rated interest and principal payment obligations under various economic, financial, and market scenarios. This is not applicable to Sublines, as LP capital calls typically occur on a non-periodic basis and the primary source of repayment for Sublines is the Fund’s UCC so once a capital call is issued, the LP is typically required to meet the capital call within a short window. Therefore, repayment capacity is analysed in the context of the prior rating determinants.
The above quantitative determinants produce a quantitative rating outcome. In addition to the above quantitative determinants, KBRA’s analysis considers a variety of qualitative factors, which can lead to upward or downward adjustments in the final rating outcome and these are assessed in the context of: (i) Manager Review; (ii) Legal Review, and (iii) Other Factors including alignment of interests, incentives to fund future capital calls and diversification within the LP base.
Rating Sensitivities
It should be noted that many aspects, including but not limited to, the rating sensitivities listed below, macroeconomic factors, market conditions, competitive landscape, and a fund manager’s investment acumen can impact the performance of the fund and influence KBRA’s rating decisions. If performance of the transaction differs meaningfully from the expected levels, KBRA may consider making a rating change.
Decline in LP Credit Quality
A decline in the credit quality of the Fund’s LPs as a result of: (i) deterioration in the credit quality of underlying LPs; (ii) transfer of interests to LPs of lower credit quality characteristics; (iii) inclusion of LPs with weak credit quality characteristics; and (iv) weaker than expected LP diversification, may result in negative rating changes.
Improvement in LP Credit Quality
An overall higher credit quality of the Fund’s LPs as a result of: (i) improvement in the credit quality of underlying LPs; (ii) transfer of interests to LPs with better credit characteristics; (iii) inclusion of LPs with strong credit quality characteristics; and (iv) stronger than expected LP diversification, may result in positive rating changes.
Underperformance of Fund Assets or Investments
A decrease in the Fund’s NAV due to underperformance of the Fund’s underlying assets or investments may jeopardise debt repayment as the deterioration of the Fund may, for example, elicit hesitation of the Fund’s LPs to fund their respective capital calls regardless of their contractual obligations to do so and the underlying LPs’ security and protections to the Lender.
To access ratings and relevant documents, click here.
Click here to view the report.